In depth autopsies reveal serious heart and other organs damage potentially due to mRNA vaccines. Topic made easier to understand for the layman.

We will try to make of this as comprehensible as possible to everyone who is not a doctor or a scientist.

Spread the word!

The European Medicines Agency approved several vaccines for COVID-19 in late 2020 and early 2021, including mRNA-based vaccines Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) and Spikevax (Moderna) and adenovirus-based vaccines Vaxzevira (AstraZeneca) and Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson/Janssen). Cases of myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle, have been reported after vaccination with mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, particularly in young males.

Myocarditis, a condition characterized by inflammation of the heart muscle, has been reported in individuals who have received mRNA-based vaccines for COVID-19.

Autopsy study 1:

A study conducted on 25 individuals who died unexpectedly within 20 days of receiving the vaccine found evidence of myocarditis in four patients. Autopsies revealed the presence of T-lymphocytic infiltration in the heart muscle, which was predominantly made up of CD4 positive cells and was associated with mild damage to the heart muscle cells. The cause of death in these cases was identified as acute arrhythmogenic cardiac failure. These findings suggest that myocarditis may be a potentially lethal complication of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines and highlight the importance of timely diagnosis and treatment in severe cases.

What are CD4 cells and what they do:

CD4 cells are responsible for helping to coordinate the activity of other immune cells and are essential for a healthy immune response. They do this by releasing chemicals called cytokines that help to activate other immune cells.  They are responsible for activating T cells that can directly attack infected cells.

Question: are mRNA vaccines having organism’s own cells attack own heart tissue.

Link to the study:

Autopsy study 2

This is an important autopsy study because it goes to also analyze histopathology and chemistry. It is important also because it was done on people who got the vaccine and died without having been at the hospital. It is thus impossible that medical procedures might have contaminated the results.

Histopathology means that not only the organs but also the cells of the body tissues and their chemistryare analyzed.

It is not possible by autopsy to detect a vaccine caused death only by examining organs.

Professor Arne Burkhardt has been working on a study in Reutlingen, Germany, which involved examining cases where relatives suspected that deaths might be related to vaccination. The study found a complex and disturbing histological picture, including vascular damage that could be attributed to vaccination.

Again:histological means that not only the organs are analyzed, also the tissues, the cells and the chemistry. It goes much deeper into the cause of death.

Forensic pathologists are the ones who examine bodies to detect a crime.

Dr. Burkhardt notices that forensic pathologists practically never examine histology (cells and tissues) anyway!

This means that even if an average autopsy would be performed it would not detect the vaccine harm.

Prof Burkhardt and their colleagues have been using various chemical and physical methods to study the effects of vaccines on the body. They have found that the spike protein, a component of the vaccine, can be produced in almost all organs and tissues, and that this can lead to inflammation of the endothelium (the inner lining of blood vessels). The study has also identified unusual deposits and clots in the blood and has found that the vaccine can contaminate tissues. The researchers have also observed the production of active spike protein in the endothelium of certain blood vessels.

What is endothelium: The endothelium is a thin layer of cells that lines the inside of blood vessels, including arteries, veins, and capillaries. It is a vital component of the circulatory system, as it helps to regulate blood flow and prevent the formation of blood clots.

Here are what Professor Arne Burkhardt found (translation from German after the picture)

Main findings:

1. Vascular damage (damage of the vessels)

a. In endothelium (so-called endothelitis = inflammation of the inner layer of cells of the vessels) this is especially in heart and lung

b. Disorders and Inflammation of major and small arteries. Arteries are the vessels that bring the blood to organs. Notice also bigger arteries are involved. This is uncommon.

C. Focal defects of the spleen-follicular arteries with follicular prolapse.

The spleen is an organ located in the upper left side of the abdomen, near the stomach. It is part of the lymphatic system, which helps to fight infection and disease. The spleen is responsible for filtering the blood and removing old or damaged red blood cells, as well as storing healthy blood cells. It also plays a role in producing immune cells and helps to fight infection.

2. Myocarditis-inflammation of the heart muscle with/without destruction. It is an inflammation of the muscle of the heart. It is a serious condition that can bring to injury or death.

3. Lymphocytic pneumo – alveolitis (endogenous-allergic?) Alveoli are tiny air sacs in the lungs where the exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide takes place. They are an important part of the respiratory system and are essential for breathing. Endogenous-allergic means that the body’s own cells may have attacked the lung by an excessive allergic reaction.                                                                                                        

4. “Lymphocyte amok, lymphocytosis” outside lymphatic organs – possible association with autoimmune diseases. These are immune system cells being in places where they are not assumed to be and attacking the tissues. The word “amok” means a sudden and unpredictable mass assault.

5. Micro- and macroembolism of unidentified foreign bodies. This is an extremely important finding:the autopsy finds microscopic and bigger clots caused by unidentified bodies.

Please spread this around. Make people aware of what is going on. People forced to get a vaccine and who dies this way have been object of a terrible crime.

The “pandemic” is being largely manipulated world-wide to force people into political, economic and financial changes they would never accept if they would not be demoralized by the effect of it.

Here Professor Arne Burkhardt tells about the findings:

The Team

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

EMA (European Medical Agency) Faulty Vaccines Approval While People Forced To Get Vaccinated. Lipid Nanoparticles Used To Deliver mRNA Are Toxic

EMA (European Medical Agency) Faulty Vaccines Approval While People Are Forced To Get Vaccinated. Lipid Nanoparticles Used To Deliver mRNA Are Toxic

EMA’s Committee’s report has 2 sections:

  1. Good manufacturing practice.
  2. Preclinical study.

The EMA Committee issued complaints about 20 points in total regarding good manufacturing practice.

The problem is that all the required analysis techniques, protocols, all commitments to EMA’s requirements are all running parallel to the vaccines being administered.

These relate to both the quality of the product and the toxicity of the vehicle used to deliver the mRNA to the cell.  Especially the BioNTech vaccine’s preclinical part is faulty. They did not conduct any clinical scrutiny at all.

Good manufacturing practices.

EMA asked for more proofs of absence of DNA contamination of the vaccine. BioNTech has admitted that there are DNA contaminants. The contaminant could integrate into the host’s cell nucleus and affect the host’s genes.

A transport verification study was not performed. There is no knowledge is the vaccine still viable after transportation. EMA asked for a rapid test so that the doctor or whoever administers the vaccine can conduct this test to check whether the batch that they have just purchased is sterile.

In some batches mRNA integrity has been found to be only 55% and the rest is just truncated pieces. Some of the vaccines for this reason are next to ineffective.

Lipid Nanoparticles

Moderna and Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccines use lipid nanoparticles that contain polyethylene glycol (PEG) to deliver mRNA to cells.

This is needed to deliver the mRNA because if one injects only the mRNA this will be in a few minutes destroyed by the nucleases (enzymes). So it needs to get to the cell “protected” by the nanoparticle.

Now attention: this is a wonderful technique for cancer. It is assumed to work by inducing self-destruction of cancer cells in a “targeted” way. With this [encapsulation] technology you can insert proteins or other substances in the nanoparticle envelope that are targeted at detecting and finding the cancer cells.

In a healthy person such as with a vaccine, it is disproportionate to apply this technology now while this toxicity exists.

Nanoparticles, are very small particles and always damaging to cells. The smaller the particle, the more interaction they can have with cell components (proteins, with other lipids, or with the DNA.)

Here is an extensive article about the subject: “Toxicity of Nanoparticles in Biomedical Application: Nanotoxicology” with 250 references to literature.

“Nanoparticles are of great importance in development and research because of their application in industries and biomedicine. The development of nanoparticles requires proper knowledge of their fabrication, interaction, release, distribution, target, compatibility, and functions. This review presents a comprehensive update on nanoparticles’ toxic effects, the factors underlying their toxicity, and the mechanisms by which toxicity is induced. Recent studies have found that nanoparticles may cause serious health effects when exposed to the body through ingestion, inhalation, and skin contact without caution. The extent to which toxicity is induced depends on some properties, including the nature and size of the nanoparticle, the surface area, shape, aspect ratio, surface coating, crystallinity, dissolution, and agglomeration. In all, the general mechanisms by which it causes toxicity lie on its capability to initiate the formation of reactive species, cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and neurotoxicity, among others.” link to the article

For the layman: cytotoxicity means that nanoparticles are damaging to cells in general, genotoxicity means they are damaging to genes, neurotoxicity means they are damaging to nervous system cells.

The lipid nanoparticles get into all cells, not just the muscle cells. The technique is used for cancer patients, but there the risk/benefit ratio is very different: justified in the treatment of cancer or other diseases when treatment is local and there no other alternatives.

In the elimination of cancer cells, the technique is designed to be local. In the case of the vaccine, it is not local. These techniques work by inducing in the cancerous cell a process called apoptosis. It means that they induce in the cell targeted self-destruction.

The nanoparticles spread out through the entire body. Studies with Luciferase, an enzyme the produces bioluminescence (and other similar markers) showed that when you inject the muscle the lipids spread out throughout the body and found that these lipids were many organs after just 15 minutes.

At the light of studies on nanoparticles’ toxicity at best it is medical malpractice when vaccine is administered to healthy people without informed consent and by free will.

It is malpractice when doctor is not informed about the pitfalls in matters of quality of the product and even more about the potential risks for the vaccinee.

At worst it is criminal activity if vaccine is administered against the will of a healthy subject or under duress like the threat of losing the job, the rights of moving freely, traveling, etc.


Correlation of the cytotoxic effects of cationic lipids with their headgroups

Toxicity of Nanoparticles in Biomedical Application: Nanotoxicology

Toxicity and cellular uptake of lipid nanoparticles of different structure and composition

The risks of nanotechnology for human health

The Team

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Coronavirus Patents Were Made For Profit Since 2000! It Arises Questions.

Question: why someone would patent the manipulation of viruses if not for commercial purposes.

Question: how far this someone would go to gain financial benefits out of the patented research findings.

Question: gain of function research began as early as 2000. How that relates to the so called “novel” coronavirus pandemic.

Recently, the Investigative Corona Committee in Germany released an almost two-hour long video with information regarding the history of coronavirus in the United States. The committee has released over 50 live streamed informational sessions and continues to do so often. The video in question included dialogue from Dr. David Martin, who among other things, has been deeply involved in the investigation of coronavirus patents for over two decades.

Dr. Martin founded M-CAM, an international intangible asset underwriter and analyst firm spanning work in innovation finance, trade, and intangible asset finance. He serves as the CEO and Chairman.

M-CAM is considered the gold standard of patent risk analysis tools, determining on an international scale what threats are presented when patents are issued and what unique commercial opportunities may be present. They track patents, patent applications, federal grants, procurement records, and e-government records.

It is important to note that: M·CAM – has been monitoring possible violations of the 1925 Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Methods of Warfare (the Geneva Protocol) 1972 Convention on the Prohibition of Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and Their Destruction (the BTWC).

Because of his line of work, Dr. Martin has reviewed over 4,000 patents issued around the coronavirus. He has also reviewed the financing of manipulation of coronavirus. At M-CAM, they took the reported novel coronavirus gene sequence (indicated as novel by the ICTV of the World Health Organization) and compared them to those on record that were already patented.

According to Dr. Martin, they found “over 120 patented pieces of evidence that the declaration of a novel coronavirus was actually entirely a fallacy” in their research. In addition, they found records of gene sequences attributed to novelty dating back over two decades, all the way back to 1999.

Pfizer sought out the first vaccine ever patented for coronavirus on Jan 28, 2000. Pfizer was then issued U.S. patent 6372224, which was a vaccine used for the canine form of coronavirus. This vaccine specifically included the S spike protein, which has been controversial in the media due to claims that the invention of this vaccine was rushed, and it is dangerous. In reality, this form of experimental approach to vaccine has been in existence for over 20 years.

Dr. Martin noted that one of the most concerning findings in his research pertained to Anthony Fauci, the current director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Fauci is most notably known for advising presidents on the HIV/AIDS crisis and other global health issues. Dr. Martin argues that Fauci and the NIAID identified coronavirus as malleable and a potential candidate for an HIV vaccine. 

In addition, Dr. Martin provides evidence to prove that in 1999, Fauci funded research at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where an “infectious replication-defective coronavirus targeted for the human lung epithelium” was inorganically built. The creation of a genetically engineered virus such as this one allowed for genetic modifications through computer software that can turn code into pathogens through gene sequencing.

Dr. Martin and the team at M-CAM were monitoring treaty violations of biological and chemical warfare in the early 2000s. During this time, scientists began to realize that coronavirus could be manipulated to become a biological weapon.

The SARS-CoV (SARS) outbreak in the early 2000s was caused by a coronavirus. The outbreak began in China between 2002-2003 and resulted in the U.S. CDC filing for a patent in 2003. This patent (U.S. patent 7220852) included the gene sequence of what became known as the SARS coronavirus, however, there were issues with this patent.

Dr. Martin knows what he is talking about. Here is a patent from 2002 on: “Methods for producing recombinant coronavirus”

They were patenting manipulation of coronaviruses already in 2002. You can find it yourself online through the above link. Do a search on Ralph S. Baric for his connections with Anthony Fauci and the related funding.

In specific:

“A still further aspect of the present invention is a method of introducing a heterologous RNA into a subject, comprising administering infectious nidovirus particles as described herein to the subject in an amount effective to introduce the heterologous RNA into the subject.”

Which is the mechanism that is used to create the “vaccines” and for several other medical purposes. Exactly the same mechanism can be used to produce a bio-weapon.

Question: why the United States Department of Defense was funding the experiments in Wuhan through EcoHealth Alliance as we describe in This Article. Is the atomic bomb stopping globalists from imposing their will on nations so that they need “new ways” of exerting power.

So far only “orange revolutions” and local wars are possible without the risk of being hit by an atomic bomb.

Question: if that is the case then who is the “enemy.” Is the enemy their own citizens regardless of what the country.

Question: is in the globalists’ view of the world perfectly “okay” to cooperate on this kind of stuff by funding it with the same nation to the seas of which they are also sending war ships.

In the case the actual official media rampant censorship shuts it down you can find this patent on our website: patent US7279327B2

Dr. Martin tells us that In the United States it is a violation to file a patent on a “product of nature”, so the application was rejected multiple times before later being approved. This patent covered the gene sequence and the means of detection for coronavirus using RT-PCR. According to Dr. Martin, “This is problematic because if you both own the patent on the gene itself, and on its detection, you have a cunning advantage to be able to control 100% of the provenance of not only the virus itself and its detection. You have entire scientific and message control.”

The CDC then claimed that their reasoning for this patent was so that everyone would be able to research the coronavirus. However, the patent office tried rejecting this patent multiple times because there was already a 99.9% genetic match with the coronavirus that was being researched already in the public domain. Additionally, the CDC paid an extra fine to keep the information within the application private until approval.

Only three days after the CDC received the patent for the SARS coronavirus gene sequence, a domestic pharmaceutical company in Maryland called Sequoia Pharmaceuticals sent in a patent application for their coronavirus treatment. Sequoia pharmaceuticals later became a subset of Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and Crucell. He claims that this becomes a pattern seen later when Moderna was engineering the vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 (known also as Covid-19).

In 2008, research was being conducted on SARS-CoV where attributes of the virus were recorded, and these attributes were later allegedly claimed to be novel to SARS-CoV-2. Patents were approved for RNA and sub-components of gene strands for the companies Ablynx and Sanofi. There was a total of 73 patents issued between 2008 and 2019 that all had the common ground of elements that were allegedly novel to SARS-CoV-2.

“By 2016, a paper by Ralph Baric was funded during the gain-of-function moratorium, saying SARS coronavirus was poised for human emergence,” Dr. Martin said. “At that time, it was not only poised for human emergence, but was patented for commercial exploitation 73 times.” Dr. Martin then goes on to explain how this was an intentional bio-weaponization of spike proteins that will be injected and cause humans to become dependent on pan-coronavirus vaccines. Dr. Martin asserted his beliefs that the goal of all this is to inject humans with potentially harmful S1 spike proteins.

Dr. Martin also went on to explain that there are no delta, gamma, beta, or alpha variants of SARS-CoV-2. By using fear of potentially dangerous new strains of the virus, more individuals would be inclined to accept a vaccine that they might otherwise decline. Depending on the fragment of the gene sequence being examined, it can be made to seem like there are different variants of the virus when it’s the same gene sequence just cut up at different points.

In the interview, Dr. Martin pointed out that there is a huge obstacle standing in the way of many fact checkers who may want to seek this information out. Many of the gene sequences are not digitally represented well, so someone fact checking this information would likely need to seek out paper records in order to make comparisons. When Dr. Martin and his colleagues did that exactly, they found that none of the gene sequences were novel in the first place.

More info on the Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier published by Dr. Martin here:

Dr. Martin presented many pieces of evidence throughout the two-hour informational session. Here Dr. Martin is interviewed by international lawyer Reiner Fuellmich. (video may start with little delay)

For the German version go to the Investigative Corona Committee of Germany’s website here:

The Team

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Modifying Human Genetics Allowed By EU DIRECTIVE Because Of “Covid-19 Emergency.” Vaccine RNA Can Affect Your DNA By Reverse Transcription.

A genetically modified organism (GMO) is any organism altered by genetic engineering techniques.

The European Union (EU) has a strict legislation on genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

The goal to prevent any adverse effects on the environment. It should prevent harm to the health and safety of humans and animals. Harm caused by genetically modified organisms.

On 15 July 2020 the EU changed the regulation of the legislation. It did that to allow clinical trials with genetically modified organisms.

You can find the decision here: Regulation (EU) 2020/1043

In article 4 you read: “1.This Regulation shall apply as long as WHO has declared COVID-19 to be a pandemic or as long as an implementing act by which the Commission recognizes a situation of public health emergency due to COVID-19 in accordance with Article 12 of Decision No 1082/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council(7) applies.”

Again, you can read in the paper that the regulation should make simpler local bureaucracy. The idea is to “help” local laws take responsibility on what will happen with vaccines.

At the end:

“The regulation is binding and directly applicable in all Member States.”

The directive applies for as long as W.H.O considers the “pandemic” a pandemic or EU decides so. In practice for as long as W.H.O decides so.

The regulation does not affect GMO medicines, it only affects “vaccines.”

So why such a strict legislation against modifying organisms by genetic engineering?

Because there are risks for humans connected with doing that!

After this regulation they still forbid doing that to plants or food.

They allow doing it to average citizens.

The risks connected with genetic engineering organisms are not predictable!

So far genetic modification has been based on a theory that one gene will express (or “code for”) one protein.

An organism’s genetic information should account a unique pattern of inherited traits.

Should be one to one predictability.

That is not true as research showed in 2013.

It is not predictable.

In 2013 scientists have discovered a second code hiding within DNA.

They came to the conclusion that: “The fact that the genetic code can simultaneously write two kinds of information means that many DNA changes that appear to alter protein sequences may actually cause disease by disrupting gene control programs or even both mechanisms simultaneously.”

You can find it explained here: scientists discover double meaning in genetic code.

Link to the scientific article here: the hidden codes that shape protein evolution.

It means that modifying organisms is not predictable and can have dangerous consequences.

CDC reassures people on their web site about these “vaccines” by stating that:’

mRNA never enters the nucleus of the cell, which is where our DNA (genetic material) is kept.

The cell breaks down and gets rid of the mRNA soon after it is finished using the instructions.

Under natural circumstances the body makes (“transcribes”) mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus.

The mRNA then travels out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm (the space out of the cell nucleus and inside the membrane of the cell)

There it provides instructions about which proteins to make.

This is the DNA > RNA pathway.

What they are saying at CDC is that the “vaccine” does it’s job inside the cell membrane.

It should do it without affecting the nucleus, where you have the DNA.

The natural process is that the DNA tells mRNA what to do to create proteins.

These so called “vaccines” double cross the natural process and create a protein of their own.

“Problem” is that the natural process goes also the other way.

They either forgot a process called reverse transcription or they think they can fool it.

There is also the inverse route: the RNA > DNA pathway.

Enzymes called reverse transcriptases can also convert RNA into DNA.

Will Pfizer/Moderna/Astra Zeneca mRNA be reverse transcribed into the natural DNA?

Will natural DNA smile at their mRNA and decide to stop giving it’s own instructions?

Yes sure… as they say at CDC “the cell breaks down the instructions and gets rid of Pfizer RNA.”

It will be “so fast” that the natural DNA will not notice…

Some psychopath took the role of God here.

And what the DNA natural coding will do in that situation?

Will that be “predictable”?

Why EU would have had a legislation against genetically modified organisms?

Why that legislation is still in place for drugs done with genetic engineering?

Are these “vaccines” in practices drugs?

Is the word “vaccine” meant to fool citizens? This kind of approach has never been used on humans.

Why the legislation is still in place for other GMOs?

Time will show and many will sit in Court Rooms if the shit will hit the fan when vaccinated people will get in contact with some virus or fragments of it.

If citizens will die even more than now for blood clouts and autoimmune reactions.

Let’s hope that the natural DNA will not get too angry.

The Team.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Biodefense, BioDisaster or BioWarfare? W.H.O Wuhan Investigation Team Has ZERO Credibility.

When this story of the Covid-19 began our first thought was:

“Chinese? Hmm… for sure there is some American involvement. We do not believe it’s only about the Chinese.”

Now everybody knows that EcoHealth Alliance financed Wuhan laboratory. EcoHealth Alliance was itself financed by several organizations, NIH, NIAD and… including the military.

In Wuhan laboratory took place dangerous gain of function experiments!

EcoHealth Alliance’s president Peter Dazak has been a member of W.H.O Wuhan investigative team!

His participation to the W.H.O investigative team is highly questionable at an extreme.

The investigation results are questionable.

It’s like sending an alleged suspect to investigate the scene of the crime!

Wuhan laboratory has a long, long history of cooperation between the U.S. and China.

Globalism is amazing.

EcoHealth Alliance has been for years the company funding Wuhan laboratory!

Recently the U.S. Department of State has expressed skepticism about the “investigation.”

The members of the WHO team told reporters that the virus likely “came from animals.”

Peter Dazak responded on Twitter:

And questioned U.S. intelligence.

It does not come as a surprise that Peter Dazak did several donations to Hilary Clinton, as below:

There is plenty of stuff to investigate and investigations are coming!

In fact this year Congressman Guy Reschenthaler introduced a bill to defund EcoHealth Alliance. He is a Republican, lawyer and Navy veteran. (link below the article)

He announced it to FoxNews and on Facebook.

The problem about Wuhan Laboratory is that there are military connections on both sides.

It has to do with BioDefense.

BioDefense – sad to say – can change into BioWarfare at the drop of a hat. It all depends on what are the goals.

It can change into BioWarfare as an accident. Or it can change with a clear goal in mind.

In fact, EcoHealth Alliance’s part of the funding came, surprise, surprise, from the:

Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DOD).

It is an agency within the United States Department of Defense and is the official Combat Support Agency for countering weapons of mass destruction.

The Funding:

In 2014 there was a petition signed by hundreds of scientists.

The Cambridge Working Group Consensus Statement on the Creation of Potential Pandemic Pathogens. (link below this article)

From the statement:

“Experiments involving the creation of potential pandemic pathogens should be curtailed until there has been a quantitative, objective and credible assessment of the risks, potential benefits, and opportunities for risk mitigation, as well as comparison against safer experimental approaches.

As a result of the expressed concern Obama administration imposed a partial ban. They lifted the ban in 2017.

The funding of gain-of-function research continued overseas at the Wuhan lab. This continued via the EcoHealth Alliance.

Maybe someone evaluated that Chinese are more fit and resist better to laboratory accidents. So they moved the whole show there.

In a 2017 research paper Wuhan researchers showed how they can change a coronavirus. How they can bind their man-made virus to the human ACE2-expressing cells.

From the research paper:

“Construction of recombinant viruses. Recombinant viruses with the S gene of the novel bat SARSr-CoVs and the backbone of the infectious clone of SARSr-CoV WIV1 were constructed using the reverse genetic system described previously .”

And again from the abstract:

Cell entry studies demonstrated that three newly identified SARSr-CoVs with different S protein sequences are all able to use human ACE2 as the receptor, further exhibiting the close relationship between strains in this cave and SARS-CoV. This work provides new insights into the origin and evolution of SARS-CoV and highlights the necessity of preparedness for future emergence of SARS-like diseases.

The “door of entrance” of Covid-19 in human body is the ACE-2 Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. It is an enzyme attached to the membranes of cells.

It is in human lungs, arteries, heart, kidney, and intestines. It is the main entrance for the Covid-19 into human body. When Covid-19 enters your body to destroy it does that through the ACE-2 receptor.

The Chinese Communist Party runs the Wuhan Institute of Virology. It manages the Biosafety Level IV (BSL-4) laboratory. In the fall of 2019, the Chinese Communist Party put Major General Chen Wei in charge of the WIV. He is China’s top BioWarfare expert

EcoHealth Alliance member of W.H.O Wuhan investigative group?

Telling us how virus originated by bats?

Give us a break!

Better to say that the virus originated by bats and was manipulated in a lab in Wuhan.

That is more correct.

Military on both sides involved in preventing pandemics caused by viruses? The goal is to be respected but..

Did BioDefense change into “BioDisaster” or … BioWarfare?

How far Globalism can go to expand it’s power?

Investigation goes on.

The Team

Cambridge Working Group Consensus Statement on the Creation of Potential Pandemic Pathogens (PPPs)

2017 Wuhan Laboratory Research. ACE-2 Receptor.

Bill To Defund EcoHealth Alliance

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.


The most used test for decision making in matters of Covid-19 is the RT-PCR test (Polymerase Chain Reaction). Several legal and scientific instances are questioning the validity of the RT-PCR test. This test is behind questionable political, administrative, and legal decisions. This test has evident fallacies that can justify legal action. One of them lies in the difference between positivity and infectiousness.

Citizens are facing limitations of their freedom on the basis of this test. They are facing collateral damage to their business activities. The finances and mental health of entire families suffer for it.

General Info About The Test

The FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved it for emergency use. See FDA link below this article. In plain English “emergency use” means that there is not enough sureness of the test’s validity. Therefore, emergency use approval.

Still the test is in use to justify actions limiting freedom. It is in use to justify limitations or closure of business activities. This caused and is causing huge collateral damage.

Difference between positivity and infectiousness.

Positivity and your infectiousness are not the same thing. The fact that a person is positive to the test does not mean the same as being able to infect another person. For this reason, decisions taken by authorities should follow infectiousness, not positivity.

Virus infectiousness is the capacity of viruses of entering the host cell and exploiting its resources to replicate and produce infectious viral particles. Affecting the host cells is the precondition for defining infectiousness!

The RT-PCR test detects the presence of the genetic material of the virus. It does not detect the degree of your infectiousness. The test detects the viral genetic material in “cycles”. The number of the cycles is called CT-value. The detection of the genetic material happens by detection of a fluorescent signal. This works by repeated cycles. Most RT-PCR tests use Ct cutoffs of 35-40 cycles. Any sample with a Ct value below the cutoff would be a positive. These even changes basing on the manufacturer!

The FDA emergency approval limits the test to reporting only positive/negative results. This is a big problem from the legal point of view. The CT cycles have an inverse correlation with the amount of virus material. The lower the value the higher the presence of the virus material.

“Positivity” has different meanings depending on the number of cycles needed to detect the amount of viral material in your case.

Most RT-PCR tests use Ct cutoffs of 35-40 cycles. At Ct value below the cutoff, you would hear this:

“Sir/Madame you are positive to the test. You need to enter quarantine” or “Sir/Madame you are positive to the test you need to shut off your business.” An entire residential area can face closure. You can get stuck in a foreign country while traveling.

We are talking here of serious interference with citizens’ legal and human rights.

This is a huge problem because:

1. The reliability of the test changes with the CT-value. Values below 24 – 20 tells that the virus genetic material is in the sample in greater quantities. Values above that begin to be unreliable even regarding the amount of material.

2. The results do not say anything on how you might infect other people. This is because: The only reliable way for detecting virus infectiousness is using cell cultures. The method is by using so called experimental cells (Vero cells).

In a study ninety positive samples were in incubation with experimental cells. Only twenty-six samples (28.9%) demonstrated viral growth. See link below.

Basing on this research all the others faced administrative decisions only based on being “positive” to the test.

In a word: the PCR-test permits the psychological manipulation of citizens (and governments as well)

This happens by cognitive dissonance.

“Sir/Madame you have the virus in your sample you are infectious to other people!”

For this reason:

1. If you tested positive ask in written and if necessary, by the help of a lawyer your laboratory CT value.

2. Ask in written explanations of how you were infectious as per medical evaluation! In the case you were without symptoms. In the case you were object of restrictions affecting your freedom. In the case it affected your business in a damaging way. The testing only is not enough.

The Team

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Coronavirus Gain Of Function CRIMINAL RESEARCH Was Already Happening Before 2002 – 2004 SARS Outbreak!

Fauci controlled NIAID funded the research.

There is no need of asking the Chinese questions they will never answer.

The coronavirus criminal investigation should be done in USA and Europe because… new disturbing evidence comes out all the time!

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services was involved in the funding of amplifying the infectious nature of coronavirus between 1999 and 2002 before SARS was ever detected in humans.

The 2002–2004 SARS outbreak was an epidemic involving severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV or SARS-CoV-1).

The outbreak was first identified in Foshan, Guangdong, China, on 16 November 2002.

SARS escaped at least twice from the Institute of Virology in Beijing, part of China’s Center for Disease Control as reported here after it happened, in 2004:

Ralph Steven Baric (born 1954) as we learn from Wikipedia is Professor in the Department of Epidemiology, and Professor in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Baric’s work involves coronaviruses, including gain of function research.

On April 19, 2002 – the spring before the first SARS outbreak in Asia – Christopher M. Curtis, Boyd Yount, and Ralph Baric filed an application for U.S. Patent 7,279,372 for a method of producing recombinant coronavirus.

In the first public record of the claims, they sought to patent a means of producing, “an infectious, replication defective, coronavirus.”

The patent is here:

We will put a copy for you on our site, in the case this would be put offline.

In specific about the patent:

“A still further aspect of the present invention is a method of introducing a heterologous RNA into a subject, comprising administering infectious nidovirus particles as described herein to the subject in an amount effective to introduce the heterologous RNA into the subject.”

It is to remember that in the 2014 the Obama Administration stopped the funding of GOF Gain of Function experiment. The ban was lifted in 2017.

Please pay attention to the dates: the NIAID National Institute Of Allergy And Infectious Diseases, controlled by Anthony Fauci, was funding Ralph S. Baric research for up to $2,102,641.

Here the funding and the dates:

The Team

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

The Vaccination Passport Aka “Green Pass” Is A Machiavellian Discriminating Tool For Power Over Citizens. Planned Already Since 2018.

It discriminates the people by putting them into two groups. These groups would have different civil rights.

It comes out that the operations for the creation of such “vaccine passport” began already in UE in 2018.

This is 2 years before the so called “pandemic.”

The revealing UE document is:


From the document:

“Examine the feasibility of developing a common vaccination card/passport for EU citizens (that takes into account potentially different national vaccination schedules and), that is compatible with electronic immunization information systems and recognized for use across borders, without duplicating work at national level.”

You can explore the document here: Roadmap Vaccination Passport.

12 September 2019 in Brussels there was the Global Vaccination Summit.

Among panel members out of 7 members 3 Gates GAVI Vaccine Alliance affiliated. Among them Joe Cerrell Managing Director for Global Policy and Advocacy, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

GAVI is the Vaccine Alliance financed by Bill & Melinda Gates foundation. We have described GAVI’s financial influence on W.H.O at least since 2009 here: Influence of Gavi on W.H.O.

You can see Global Vaccination Summit’s panel members here: Panel Members.

As panel member Pfizer representative. Nanette Cocero Pfizer Biopharmaceutical Group’s Global President (Vaccines Europe)

You can see the other panel members here: Panel Members.

The vaccination passport is a manipulative supranational health policy disguised as good will.

It double-crosses the Rule of Law and the Constitution of the State Members.

It supports the forced sales of vaccines and several other health care products.

It uses manipulative means to force the population to use vaccines. As the vaccines are still experimental without full FDA approval, citizens become experiment rats.

The “vaccine passport” creates a Machiavellian tool to control UE citizens. It divides them into two castes.

Bill Gates GAVI had 3 members out of 7 in one panel. Pfizer Global President Nanette Cocero was part of another panel, together with W.H.O member.

Forcing people into vaccinations in the realm of inducing fear constitutes a crime of extortion. Definition of Crime of Extortion.

Is this a group of people trying to improve the health policy of member states or is this the Mafia?

Lawsuits already arising everywhere around the world will tell.

Let’s hope it will be enough. This process can bring to much worse than lawsuits.

It has happened before during history. Citizens are not idiots. Among them there is the middle class. The attempt of destroying the middle class brought to revolutions before.

Spread this around. The more information citizens receive the more difficult the manipulation becomes!

The Team.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Forced & Manipulative Experimental Vaccination In Israel. Israeli Law Firm Files A Lawsuit At Hague International Criminal Court.

The law firm, A. Suchovolsky & Co did that on behalf of Anshei Emet (People of Truth). This is a group of doctors, lawyers, and activists.

Subject of complain is the violation of Nuremberg Code by the Government of Israel. For historical reasons this is a serious topic in Israel.

Subject matter of the lawsuit: the mRNA treatment for Covid-19 is not a traditional vaccine. It is experimental. There is no full FDA approval. It has at least 22 side effects. All immunizations before operated in a different way. This was by the introduction of a deactivated virus. The virus induced natural arousal of immunity. There is not enough scientific evidence about the safety of the new method.

Main points of the lawsuit:

  • It violated the principle of informed consent stated in Nuremberg code.
  • Israel Government did a separate agreement with Pfizer. The agreement was not transparent. The law suit claims that Israeli citizens allegedly served as object of experiment.
  • Allegedly the Israeli Government delivered citizens’ medical and personal information without consent.
  • Failure to give Israeli citizens the right for information about alternative treatments. Failure to respect the right to choose among them.
  • Lawsuit claims that the treatment caused the death of many, injury and severe damage. They report a rate of 41% of subject injured.
  • Experiment is not allowed when there is reason to assume that death or injury may occur.
  • The experiment must be stopped if death or injury occurs.

Several media report that Hague International Criminal Court has no jurisdiction on Israel. This is probably true. We do not believe this is enough of an argument.

Israel does have own informed consent laws.

Kol-Zchut (All Rights) an Israeli non-profit organization describes well Israeli informed consent law. Israeli local law is called the Patients’ Rights Law. There are exceptions to this law. More in the link below the article.

We cannot find in the list of exceptions anything connected with Covid-19 vaccination.

In the law is noted that: ” If the care provider imposed medical treatment on the patient, performed medical treatment without patient consent, or performed medical treatment with patient consent but without disclosing relevant information regarding the patient’s medical condition or the proposed treatment, the patient may sue the care provider and medical facility where the treatment was provided for damages (a claim for monetary compensation). “

We assume the lawsuit will confront what happened not only at Hague but also at the level of local Israeli law. We would be surprised if not.

Link To Lawsuit:

Kol-Zchut (All Rights), link to Israeli law of informed consent:

Israeli Law Of Informed Consent

The Team

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Vaccination Rush. Inducing Fear And Rush For Commercial Profit? Antibody-dependent Enhancement (ADE) and Vaccines.

There are several recent reports of adverse reactions and deaths due to vaccines. Recent reports connect to Astra Zeneca. An Italian cardiologist, Dr. Fabrizio Salvucci, thinks it is not about Astra Zeneca only.

The official narrative is: if you are positive to PCR test you can infect other people. If you are positive to PCR test you have Covid-19.

One of the most important Italian newspapers, Il Giornale, reports that fatalities could be due to ADE. It might be a risk with every vaccine used. This risk with vaccines has been known already for long.

What is Antibody-dependent Enhancement? (ADE).

In normal conditions your antibodies try to stop viruses from entering your cells. A major goal of your antibodies is to bind to the pathogen and prevent it from infecting your cell.

In ADE things can go wrong. ADE can make even worse the inflammatory response caused by the virus. It is a situation where antibodies even make the infection caused by the virus “more strong.” They in a way begin to help and enhance the pathological response.

More about ADE in the article below. Below also Italian newspaper’s article and raw English translation.

We know about ADE already since 1977. So far ADE has been a reason for withdrawing a vaccine from the market. A part of III level vaccine trials is to exclude or at least prevent ADE.

Below an article about informed consent to vaccine trials about the risk for ADE.

For example they took out of the market a vaccine for RSV, a virus causing pediatric infection. This was because of the development of ADE with fatal consequences.

Dr. Fabrizio Salvucci says it is not about Astra Zeneca, or Pfizer or other vaccine.

The risk as we know since 1997 is with all the vaccines and there is more, in a broader sense.

He says that ADE happens when the individual already has “natural antibodies.”

Of course the actual narrative is: if the person got Covid-19 this person has already antibodies.

Cognitive dissonance used as a manipulation tool because: what about natural immunity to Covid-19 in absence of symptoms?

What about the natural response of the immune system to the spike protein induced by the mRNA vaccine?

Would the immune system respond to that with an enhancement of the immune response and bring to ADE?

If so there are big reasons to worry.

Dr. Salvucci suggests that a serologic examination before the vaccination should take place.

It makes a lot of sense: detecting level of antibodies before giving the vaccine. He is a clinician. He sees this from a practical point of view.

This brings on the table many questions:

1. Natural immunity was not taken in account when the fear inducing process began. It is clear that without natural immunity there would have been far bigger disaster. If we compare to what HIV does to the immune system we can see the difference with Covid-19.

2. The PCR test detects the presence of the genetic material of the virus. It is still unclear how specific is the test in excluding other viruses. This caused miscalculations, with severe consequences on people’s life and economy. It is up to the law to define was this unintentional or done in purpose for financial interests. Both options have inside legal consequences.

3. What about the scientists who helped the politicians to make decisions. Did they take into account the presence of natural immunity? How they took into account differential diagnosis between positivity and infectiousness?

4. Where the vaccines introduced into the market tested for the possibility of ADE? How financial interests influenced the decisions? Was the rush in developing the vaccines justified so much to avoid proper trials?

Was the risk for ADE ruled out in vaccine trials?

The enhanced response to the disease can worsen the condition. It can cause severe organ failures and/or death.

The Team

About ADE

ADE as a reason for vaccine severe side effects and deaths?

Raw English Translation:

Disclosure of ADE To Participants To Vaccine Trials

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

The Globalist “Russian Roulette.” Critics To Russian Vaccine. 3 Countries Suspend Astra Zeneca Vaccine For Allegedly Lethal Consequences.

Several media sources report this.

Christa Wirthumer-Hoche, the head of European Medicines Agency’s management board criticized Russian vaccine. Austria asked should they approve the vaccine.

Wirthumer-Hoche told the country’s ORF broadcaster: “It’s somewhat comparable to Russian roulette.”

Here the prompt Russian response.

We would say she would better focus more on the “Globalist Roulette.” We learned today that Denmark, Norway and Island suspended Astra Zeneca vaccinations.

There is a big reason to worry about why. Several cases of blood clots among vaccinated people. Blood clots (thrombi) can be life threatening, often in a short time.

Everyone knows that the globalist agenda does not like Putin’s Russia. This is because Russians do not agree to have their traditions and national identity destroyed.

Globalism cannot do that to them by the manipulative psychopathic means of deconstruction of their identity.

A study published on Lancet demonstrated that the Sputnik-V has an efficiency of 91.6%

There is otherwise a lot of good to say about Russian vaccine Sputnik V.

The Sputnik V vaccine uses a vector. It uses a quite common virus, an adenovirus. The developers first neutralize the carrier virus capability of replicating.

The adenovirus enters your cells without the ability of causing infection.

It carries the information necessary for your cells begin to build a response. Your cells begin to build the response to the coronavirus. Your cells begin to do that when confronted with the information presented by the deactivated adenovirus.

Instead, The Pfizer/Moderna vaccines insert into your body a genetic code, mRNA. This enters your cells and forces them to produce the immune response. The vaccine uses engineered RNA that writes instructions for certain tasks.

When we compared the two methods, we see a striking difference.

The Sputnik V “presents” to your cell the necessary information to elicit the response.

The Pfizer/Moderna vaccines enter your cells and “programs them” to give a response.

Which one of the two methods in your opinion raises more questions?

What about risks, dangers, ethical issues and possible abuses of the method?

You do not need to be a scientist to see the difference.

In the meanwhile, the law of market and fear of death are already turning globalists game against themselves.

Swiss-Italian company Adienne Pharma&Biotech located in North Italy begins to produce Sputnik-V. Not without facing political resistance.

The Team

Disclaimer: we are independent media. We do not work for anyone.

Sputnik V:


Astra Zeneca

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.