Coronavirus Gain Of Function CRIMINAL RESEARCH Was Already Happening Before 2002 – 2004 SARS Outbreak!

Fauci controlled NIAID funded the research.

There is no need of asking the Chinese questions they will never answer.

The coronavirus criminal investigation should be done in USA and Europe because… new disturbing evidence comes out all the time!

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services was involved in the funding of amplifying the infectious nature of coronavirus between 1999 and 2002 before SARS was ever detected in humans.

The 2002–2004 SARS outbreak was an epidemic involving severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV or SARS-CoV-1).

The outbreak was first identified in Foshan, Guangdong, China, on 16 November 2002.

SARS escaped at least twice from the Institute of Virology in Beijing, part of China’s Center for Disease Control as reported here after it happened, in 2004:

Ralph Steven Baric (born 1954) as we learn from Wikipedia is Professor in the Department of Epidemiology, and Professor in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Baric’s work involves coronaviruses, including gain of function research.

On April 19, 2002 – the spring before the first SARS outbreak in Asia – Christopher M. Curtis, Boyd Yount, and Ralph Baric filed an application for U.S. Patent 7,279,372 for a method of producing recombinant coronavirus.

In the first public record of the claims, they sought to patent a means of producing, “an infectious, replication defective, coronavirus.”

The patent is here:

We will put a copy for you on our site, in the case this would be put offline.

In specific about the patent:

“A still further aspect of the present invention is a method of introducing a heterologous RNA into a subject, comprising administering infectious nidovirus particles as described herein to the subject in an amount effective to introduce the heterologous RNA into the subject.”

It is to remember that in the 2014 the Obama Administration stopped the funding of GOF Gain of Function experiment. The ban was lifted in 2017.

Please pay attention to the dates: the NIAID National Institute Of Allergy And Infectious Diseases, controlled by Anthony Fauci, was funding Ralph S. Baric research for up to $2,102,641.

Here the funding and the dates:

The Team

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Coronavirus Patents Were Made For Profit Since 2000! It Arises Questions.

Question: why someone would patent the manipulation of viruses if not for commercial purposes.

Question: how far this someone would go to gain financial benefits out of the patented research findings.

Question: gain of function research began as early as 2000. How that relates to the so called “novel” coronavirus pandemic.

Recently, the Investigative Corona Committee in Germany released an almost two-hour long video with information regarding the history of coronavirus in the United States. The committee has released over 50 live streamed informational sessions and continues to do so often. The video in question included dialogue from Dr. David Martin, who among other things, has been deeply involved in the investigation of coronavirus patents for over two decades.

Dr. Martin founded M-CAM, an international intangible asset underwriter and analyst firm spanning work in innovation finance, trade, and intangible asset finance. He serves as the CEO and Chairman.

M-CAM is considered the gold standard of patent risk analysis tools, determining on an international scale what threats are presented when patents are issued and what unique commercial opportunities may be present. They track patents, patent applications, federal grants, procurement records, and e-government records.

It is important to note that: M·CAM – has been monitoring possible violations of the 1925 Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Methods of Warfare (the Geneva Protocol) 1972 Convention on the Prohibition of Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and Their Destruction (the BTWC).

Because of his line of work, Dr. Martin has reviewed over 4,000 patents issued around the coronavirus. He has also reviewed the financing of manipulation of coronavirus. At M-CAM, they took the reported novel coronavirus gene sequence (indicated as novel by the ICTV of the World Health Organization) and compared them to those on record that were already patented.

According to Dr. Martin, they found “over 120 patented pieces of evidence that the declaration of a novel coronavirus was actually entirely a fallacy” in their research. In addition, they found records of gene sequences attributed to novelty dating back over two decades, all the way back to 1999.

Pfizer sought out the first vaccine ever patented for coronavirus on Jan 28, 2000. Pfizer was then issued U.S. patent 6372224, which was a vaccine used for the canine form of coronavirus. This vaccine specifically included the S spike protein, which has been controversial in the media due to claims that the invention of this vaccine was rushed, and it is dangerous. In reality, this form of experimental approach to vaccine has been in existence for over 20 years.

Dr. Martin noted that one of the most concerning findings in his research pertained to Anthony Fauci, the current director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Fauci is most notably known for advising presidents on the HIV/AIDS crisis and other global health issues. Dr. Martin argues that Fauci and the NIAID identified coronavirus as malleable and a potential candidate for an HIV vaccine. 

In addition, Dr. Martin provides evidence to prove that in 1999, Fauci funded research at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where an “infectious replication-defective coronavirus targeted for the human lung epithelium” was inorganically built. The creation of a genetically engineered virus such as this one allowed for genetic modifications through computer software that can turn code into pathogens through gene sequencing.

Dr. Martin and the team at M-CAM were monitoring treaty violations of biological and chemical warfare in the early 2000s. During this time, scientists began to realize that coronavirus could be manipulated to become a biological weapon.

The SARS-CoV (SARS) outbreak in the early 2000s was caused by a coronavirus. The outbreak began in China between 2002-2003 and resulted in the U.S. CDC filing for a patent in 2003. This patent (U.S. patent 7220852) included the gene sequence of what became known as the SARS coronavirus, however, there were issues with this patent.

Dr. Martin knows what he is talking about. Here is a patent from 2002 on: “Methods for producing recombinant coronavirus”

They were patenting manipulation of coronaviruses already in 2002. You can find it yourself online through the above link. Do a search on Ralph S. Baric for his connections with Anthony Fauci and the related funding.

In specific:

“A still further aspect of the present invention is a method of introducing a heterologous RNA into a subject, comprising administering infectious nidovirus particles as described herein to the subject in an amount effective to introduce the heterologous RNA into the subject.”

Which is the mechanism that is used to create the “vaccines” and for several other medical purposes. Exactly the same mechanism can be used to produce a bio-weapon.

Question: why the United States Department of Defense was funding the experiments in Wuhan through EcoHealth Alliance as we describe in This Article. Is the atomic bomb stopping globalists from imposing their will on nations so that they need “new ways” of exerting power.

So far only “orange revolutions” and local wars are possible without the risk of being hit by an atomic bomb.

Question: if that is the case then who is the “enemy.” Is the enemy their own citizens regardless of what the country.

Question: is in the globalists’ view of the world perfectly “okay” to cooperate on this kind of stuff by funding it with the same nation to the seas of which they are also sending war ships.

In the case the actual official media rampant censorship shuts it down you can find this patent on our website: patent US7279327B2

Dr. Martin tells us that In the United States it is a violation to file a patent on a “product of nature”, so the application was rejected multiple times before later being approved. This patent covered the gene sequence and the means of detection for coronavirus using RT-PCR. According to Dr. Martin, “This is problematic because if you both own the patent on the gene itself, and on its detection, you have a cunning advantage to be able to control 100% of the provenance of not only the virus itself and its detection. You have entire scientific and message control.”

The CDC then claimed that their reasoning for this patent was so that everyone would be able to research the coronavirus. However, the patent office tried rejecting this patent multiple times because there was already a 99.9% genetic match with the coronavirus that was being researched already in the public domain. Additionally, the CDC paid an extra fine to keep the information within the application private until approval.

Only three days after the CDC received the patent for the SARS coronavirus gene sequence, a domestic pharmaceutical company in Maryland called Sequoia Pharmaceuticals sent in a patent application for their coronavirus treatment. Sequoia pharmaceuticals later became a subset of Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and Crucell. He claims that this becomes a pattern seen later when Moderna was engineering the vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 (known also as Covid-19).

In 2008, research was being conducted on SARS-CoV where attributes of the virus were recorded, and these attributes were later allegedly claimed to be novel to SARS-CoV-2. Patents were approved for RNA and sub-components of gene strands for the companies Ablynx and Sanofi. There was a total of 73 patents issued between 2008 and 2019 that all had the common ground of elements that were allegedly novel to SARS-CoV-2.

“By 2016, a paper by Ralph Baric was funded during the gain-of-function moratorium, saying SARS coronavirus was poised for human emergence,” Dr. Martin said. “At that time, it was not only poised for human emergence, but was patented for commercial exploitation 73 times.” Dr. Martin then goes on to explain how this was an intentional bio-weaponization of spike proteins that will be injected and cause humans to become dependent on pan-coronavirus vaccines. Dr. Martin asserted his beliefs that the goal of all this is to inject humans with potentially harmful S1 spike proteins.

Dr. Martin also went on to explain that there are no delta, gamma, beta, or alpha variants of SARS-CoV-2. By using fear of potentially dangerous new strains of the virus, more individuals would be inclined to accept a vaccine that they might otherwise decline. Depending on the fragment of the gene sequence being examined, it can be made to seem like there are different variants of the virus when it’s the same gene sequence just cut up at different points.

In the interview, Dr. Martin pointed out that there is a huge obstacle standing in the way of many fact checkers who may want to seek this information out. Many of the gene sequences are not digitally represented well, so someone fact checking this information would likely need to seek out paper records in order to make comparisons. When Dr. Martin and his colleagues did that exactly, they found that none of the gene sequences were novel in the first place.

More info on the Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier published by Dr. Martin here:

Dr. Martin presented many pieces of evidence throughout the two-hour informational session. Here Dr. Martin is interviewed by international lawyer Reiner Fuellmich. (video may start with little delay)

For the German version go to the Investigative Corona Committee of Germany’s website here:

The Team

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Modifying Human Genetics Allowed By EU DIRECTIVE Because Of “Covid-19 Emergency.” Vaccine RNA Can Affect Your DNA By Reverse Transcription.

A genetically modified organism (GMO) is any organism altered by genetic engineering techniques.

The European Union (EU) has a strict legislation on genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

The goal to prevent any adverse effects on the environment. It should prevent harm to the health and safety of humans and animals. Harm caused by genetically modified organisms.

On 15 July 2020 the EU changed the regulation of the legislation. It did that to allow clinical trials with genetically modified organisms.

You can find the decision here: Regulation (EU) 2020/1043

In article 4 you read: “1.This Regulation shall apply as long as WHO has declared COVID-19 to be a pandemic or as long as an implementing act by which the Commission recognizes a situation of public health emergency due to COVID-19 in accordance with Article 12 of Decision No 1082/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council(7) applies.”

Again, you can read in the paper that the regulation should make simpler local bureaucracy. The idea is to “help” local laws take responsibility on what will happen with vaccines.

At the end:

“The regulation is binding and directly applicable in all Member States.”

The directive applies for as long as W.H.O considers the “pandemic” a pandemic or EU decides so. In practice for as long as W.H.O decides so.

The regulation does not affect GMO medicines, it only affects “vaccines.”

So why such a strict legislation against modifying organisms by genetic engineering?

Because there are risks for humans connected with doing that!

After this regulation they still forbid doing that to plants or food.

They allow doing it to average citizens.

The risks connected with genetic engineering organisms are not predictable!

So far genetic modification has been based on a theory that one gene will express (or “code for”) one protein.

An organism’s genetic information should account a unique pattern of inherited traits.

Should be one to one predictability.

That is not true as research showed in 2013.

It is not predictable.

In 2013 scientists have discovered a second code hiding within DNA.

They came to the conclusion that: “The fact that the genetic code can simultaneously write two kinds of information means that many DNA changes that appear to alter protein sequences may actually cause disease by disrupting gene control programs or even both mechanisms simultaneously.”

You can find it explained here: scientists discover double meaning in genetic code.

Link to the scientific article here: the hidden codes that shape protein evolution.

It means that modifying organisms is not predictable and can have dangerous consequences.

CDC reassures people on their web site about these “vaccines” by stating that:’

mRNA never enters the nucleus of the cell, which is where our DNA (genetic material) is kept.

The cell breaks down and gets rid of the mRNA soon after it is finished using the instructions.

Under natural circumstances the body makes (“transcribes”) mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus.

The mRNA then travels out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm (the space out of the cell nucleus and inside the membrane of the cell)

There it provides instructions about which proteins to make.

This is the DNA > RNA pathway.

What they are saying at CDC is that the “vaccine” does it’s job inside the cell membrane.

It should do it without affecting the nucleus, where you have the DNA.

The natural process is that the DNA tells mRNA what to do to create proteins.

These so called “vaccines” double cross the natural process and create a protein of their own.

“Problem” is that the natural process goes also the other way.

They either forgot a process called reverse transcription or they think they can fool it.

There is also the inverse route: the RNA > DNA pathway.

Enzymes called reverse transcriptases can also convert RNA into DNA.

Will Pfizer/Moderna/Astra Zeneca mRNA be reverse transcribed into the natural DNA?

Will natural DNA smile at their mRNA and decide to stop giving it’s own instructions?

Yes sure… as they say at CDC “the cell breaks down the instructions and gets rid of Pfizer RNA.”

It will be “so fast” that the natural DNA will not notice…

Some psychopath took the role of God here.

And what the DNA natural coding will do in that situation?

Will that be “predictable”?

Why EU would have had a legislation against genetically modified organisms?

Why that legislation is still in place for drugs done with genetic engineering?

Are these “vaccines” in practices drugs?

Is the word “vaccine” meant to fool citizens? This kind of approach has never been used on humans.

Why the legislation is still in place for other GMOs?

Time will show and many will sit in Court Rooms if the shit will hit the fan when vaccinated people will get in contact with some virus or fragments of it.

If citizens will die even more than now for blood clouts and autoimmune reactions.

Let’s hope that the natural DNA will not get too angry.

The Team.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

The Vaccination Passport Aka “Green Pass” Is A Machiavellian Discriminating Tool For Power Over Citizens. Planned Already Since 2018.

It discriminates the people by putting them into two groups. These groups would have different civil rights.

It comes out that the operations for the creation of such “vaccine passport” began already in UE in 2018.

This is 2 years before the so called “pandemic.”

The revealing UE document is:


From the document:

“Examine the feasibility of developing a common vaccination card/passport for EU citizens (that takes into account potentially different national vaccination schedules and), that is compatible with electronic immunization information systems and recognized for use across borders, without duplicating work at national level.”

You can explore the document here: Roadmap Vaccination Passport.

12 September 2019 in Brussels there was the Global Vaccination Summit.

Among panel members out of 7 members 3 Gates GAVI Vaccine Alliance affiliated. Among them Joe Cerrell Managing Director for Global Policy and Advocacy, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

GAVI is the Vaccine Alliance financed by Bill & Melinda Gates foundation. We have described GAVI’s financial influence on W.H.O at least since 2009 here: Influence of Gavi on W.H.O.

You can see Global Vaccination Summit’s panel members here: Panel Members.

As panel member Pfizer representative. Nanette Cocero Pfizer Biopharmaceutical Group’s Global President (Vaccines Europe)

You can see the other panel members here: Panel Members.

The vaccination passport is a manipulative supranational health policy disguised as good will.

It double-crosses the Rule of Law and the Constitution of the State Members.

It supports the forced sales of vaccines and several other health care products.

It uses manipulative means to force the population to use vaccines. As the vaccines are still experimental without full FDA approval, citizens become experiment rats.

The “vaccine passport” creates a Machiavellian tool to control UE citizens. It divides them into two castes.

Bill Gates GAVI had 3 members out of 7 in one panel. Pfizer Global President Nanette Cocero was part of another panel, together with W.H.O member.

Forcing people into vaccinations in the realm of inducing fear constitutes a crime of extortion. Definition of Crime of Extortion.

Is this a group of people trying to improve the health policy of member states or is this the Mafia?

Lawsuits already arising everywhere around the world will tell.

Let’s hope it will be enough. This process can bring to much worse than lawsuits.

It has happened before during history. Citizens are not idiots. Among them there is the middle class. The attempt of destroying the middle class brought to revolutions before.

Spread this around. The more information citizens receive the more difficult the manipulation becomes!

The Team.

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Forced & Manipulative Experimental Vaccination In Israel. Israeli Law Firm Files A Lawsuit At Hague International Criminal Court.

The law firm, A. Suchovolsky & Co did that on behalf of Anshei Emet (People of Truth). This is a group of doctors, lawyers, and activists.

Subject of complain is the violation of Nuremberg Code by the Government of Israel. For historical reasons this is a serious topic in Israel.

Subject matter of the lawsuit: the mRNA treatment for Covid-19 is not a traditional vaccine. It is experimental. There is no full FDA approval. It has at least 22 side effects. All immunizations before operated in a different way. This was by the introduction of a deactivated virus. The virus induced natural arousal of immunity. There is not enough scientific evidence about the safety of the new method.

Main points of the lawsuit:

  • It violated the principle of informed consent stated in Nuremberg code.
  • Israel Government did a separate agreement with Pfizer. The agreement was not transparent. The law suit claims that Israeli citizens allegedly served as object of experiment.
  • Allegedly the Israeli Government delivered citizens’ medical and personal information without consent.
  • Failure to give Israeli citizens the right for information about alternative treatments. Failure to respect the right to choose among them.
  • Lawsuit claims that the treatment caused the death of many, injury and severe damage. They report a rate of 41% of subject injured.
  • Experiment is not allowed when there is reason to assume that death or injury may occur.
  • The experiment must be stopped if death or injury occurs.

Several media report that Hague International Criminal Court has no jurisdiction on Israel. This is probably true. We do not believe this is enough of an argument.

Israel does have own informed consent laws.

Kol-Zchut (All Rights) an Israeli non-profit organization describes well Israeli informed consent law. Israeli local law is called the Patients’ Rights Law. There are exceptions to this law. More in the link below the article.

We cannot find in the list of exceptions anything connected with Covid-19 vaccination.

In the law is noted that: ” If the care provider imposed medical treatment on the patient, performed medical treatment without patient consent, or performed medical treatment with patient consent but without disclosing relevant information regarding the patient’s medical condition or the proposed treatment, the patient may sue the care provider and medical facility where the treatment was provided for damages (a claim for monetary compensation). “

We assume the lawsuit will confront what happened not only at Hague but also at the level of local Israeli law. We would be surprised if not.

Link To Lawsuit:

Kol-Zchut (All Rights), link to Israeli law of informed consent:

Israeli Law Of Informed Consent

The Team

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Vaccination Rush. Inducing Fear And Rush For Commercial Profit? Antibody-dependent Enhancement (ADE) and Vaccines.

There are several recent reports of adverse reactions and deaths due to vaccines. Recent reports connect to Astra Zeneca. An Italian cardiologist, Dr. Fabrizio Salvucci, thinks it is not about Astra Zeneca only.

The official narrative is: if you are positive to PCR test you can infect other people. If you are positive to PCR test you have Covid-19.

One of the most important Italian newspapers, Il Giornale, reports that fatalities could be due to ADE. It might be a risk with every vaccine used. This risk with vaccines has been known already for long.

What is Antibody-dependent Enhancement? (ADE).

In normal conditions your antibodies try to stop viruses from entering your cells. A major goal of your antibodies is to bind to the pathogen and prevent it from infecting your cell.

In ADE things can go wrong. ADE can make even worse the inflammatory response caused by the virus. It is a situation where antibodies even make the infection caused by the virus “more strong.” They in a way begin to help and enhance the pathological response.

More about ADE in the article below. Below also Italian newspaper’s article and raw English translation.

We know about ADE already since 1977. So far ADE has been a reason for withdrawing a vaccine from the market. A part of III level vaccine trials is to exclude or at least prevent ADE.

Below an article about informed consent to vaccine trials about the risk for ADE.

For example they took out of the market a vaccine for RSV, a virus causing pediatric infection. This was because of the development of ADE with fatal consequences.

Dr. Fabrizio Salvucci says it is not about Astra Zeneca, or Pfizer or other vaccine.

The risk as we know since 1997 is with all the vaccines and there is more, in a broader sense.

He says that ADE happens when the individual already has “natural antibodies.”

Of course the actual narrative is: if the person got Covid-19 this person has already antibodies.

Cognitive dissonance used as a manipulation tool because: what about natural immunity to Covid-19 in absence of symptoms?

What about the natural response of the immune system to the spike protein induced by the mRNA vaccine?

Would the immune system respond to that with an enhancement of the immune response and bring to ADE?

If so there are big reasons to worry.

Dr. Salvucci suggests that a serologic examination before the vaccination should take place.

It makes a lot of sense: detecting level of antibodies before giving the vaccine. He is a clinician. He sees this from a practical point of view.

This brings on the table many questions:

1. Natural immunity was not taken in account when the fear inducing process began. It is clear that without natural immunity there would have been far bigger disaster. If we compare to what HIV does to the immune system we can see the difference with Covid-19.

2. The PCR test detects the presence of the genetic material of the virus. It is still unclear how specific is the test in excluding other viruses. This caused miscalculations, with severe consequences on people’s life and economy. It is up to the law to define was this unintentional or done in purpose for financial interests. Both options have inside legal consequences.

3. What about the scientists who helped the politicians to make decisions. Did they take into account the presence of natural immunity? How they took into account differential diagnosis between positivity and infectiousness?

4. Where the vaccines introduced into the market tested for the possibility of ADE? How financial interests influenced the decisions? Was the rush in developing the vaccines justified so much to avoid proper trials?

Was the risk for ADE ruled out in vaccine trials?

The enhanced response to the disease can worsen the condition. It can cause severe organ failures and/or death.

The Team

About ADE

ADE as a reason for vaccine severe side effects and deaths?

Raw English Translation:

Disclosure of ADE To Participants To Vaccine Trials

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Covid-19 Unlawful Deprivation Of Freedom. Court Decision. Illegal Medical Practice.

Depriving an individual of freedom is a crime in the law of all democratic countries.

“Habeas corpus” is a recourse in law. Through that a person can report an unlawful detention or imprisonment to a court.

The practice of medicine without a license is a crime. It is important to understand that diagnosing a disease is medical practice.

This is even more true when the diagnosis has medico-legal consequences for a citizen.

Only doctors can diagnose diseases. Law sets limits to doctors, too. A doctor cannot diagnose a diseases without proper examination and proper testing.
Portugal is a country member of the EU.

A Portuguese Court in Habeas Corpus case – PROCESSO N.º 1783/20.7T8PDL.L1-3 – ruled the limits of covid PCR testing,

It also ruled the legal limits of restriction of freedom and medical practice. (Process in Portuguese is judicial process, court case)

The facts: four persons arrived from Germany 08/01/2020 to the Island of São Miguel. All the four persons were resident in Germany. At arrival they presented negative Covid19 test. 08/07/2020 they got tested again. 08/08/2020 one of the applicants came out as positive in the test. This applicant moved to another facility.

Then there was a decision for quarantine from health authorities. Basing on Court paper the four persons after two weeks in quarantine showed no symptoms. The four persons rescheduled their flights. 08/24/2020 the same person tested again positive. The staff of the hotel told them that all the four of them must remain in their rooms. You can read more about the facts in the court case report, available online.

The Court decided of granting no appeal and demanded the immediate release of the four people.

In this Court decision there are several important statements. They outline important facts about the PCR-test and about medical practice.

These are:

Prescription and diagnosis are medical acts, under the exclusive responsibility of a doctor. registered in the Order of Doctors.

Law, Resolution, Decree, Regulation or any other normative way cannot prescribe diagnostic methods.

They cannot diagnose the existence of disease. These acts are under Portugal’s legal system an exclusive competence of a doctor. Informed consent is obligatory. ‘

These are rules in force more or less in all free democratic countries. Not only Portugal.

About PCR test the Court outlines:

PCR-test is unable to determine, beyond reasonable doubt, that positivity corresponds to infection.

Because the reliability depend on the number of cycles that make up the test. For this reliability depend on the amount of viral load present.

In our opinion: this Court decision is a precedent for legal action from all those who faced similar events.

The Court mentions as scientific background this article published in Lancet.

False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and costs

In our opinion those whose freedom faces restriction on the basis of:

1. Only the PCR test

2. Without a proper medical examination

3. Without a doctor’s clinical evaluation of the existence of infection (not only positivity!)

Can start legal action against the improper decisions made for restricting their freedom.

Link to Court decision:

Link to raw English translation.

The Team

Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Crimes Against Citizens

The purpose of an investigation is to detect the facts. An investigation derives from the assumption that a crime has taken place.

As new knowledge arises the investigation either confirms the facts or discards them.

Here we will first describe certain assumptions. Then, over time, we will investigate the facts.

Assumption: in the so called “developed” countries traditional political forces do not exists anymore.

As Warren Buffet himself admitted there is, yes, a social class war going on. This social class war has only two “parties.” These are the financial and political establishment and the average citizen.

In several countries citizens faces more and more crimes against their own interests and safety. The citizens face attempts to take away their rights and their freedom.

The crimes origin from an attempt to achieve financial power in a criminal way. Recent financial crisis are criminal activities. They are an attempt to get power over nations, businesses and individuals by criminal means.

The means used to get that power are:

Stealing Identity.
Selective Warfare.

There is a public propaganda attempting to create more and more democracy. The real goal behind is to establish a financial dictatorship. The dictatorship bases itself on the absence of any value, other than the materialistic ones.

The citizen exists in it only as an instrument. The citizen is in the new vision of the world an inanimate object with only a financial and mechanical purpose.

In public the establishment acts “for the citizens” and for “human rights.” It does that by hiding behind corrupted politicians. Behind the curtains it acts with the goal of taking away from citizens all their rights. It tends to even steal from citizens their identity.

They pretend to work for the citizens. They work for their interest, behind the curtains. The plan is to enslave the population to the will of bigger interests.

This process has always existed. It only became recently much more brutal and much less “hidden.” There it is an attempt to create a world-wide financial dictatorial system.

This is a war on identity. This war happens by psychological manipulative means. It tends to steal the identity of whole nations and individuals. Those who do not follow the manipulation face selective military warfare. It is also a cheap kind of war.

The tools used for the manipulation:

IT systems and internet: their goal is to capture the mind of their users. Ownership over those system gives the chance of manipulating them to obey the will of the system.

Social Media: by “TOS” (terms of service) and “Editorial Guidelines” they manipulate users. They steal their identity. They force them to conform to the “culture” the establishment wants.

Corrupted politicians, who sell entire nations to the financial interests. The interests of corrupted financial institutions and businesses.

This has been lasting for long. The process indicates something close to a system like the former Soviet Union.

A “technological” and “financial” Soviet Union.

The recent ban from social media of US President Donald Trump brought this to the light. Financial institutions and businesses are getting power over governments. They do so with the help of corrupted politicians.

Businesses and financial institutions interfered with that. The first one was an alleged attempt to instigate a coup. The second one was the same thing: an attempt to influence Government decisions. It attempted to take away from Government institutional power.

We can wonder which one of the two was more of an attempted coup. The second one looked more as a successful coup, other than “attempted.”

Anyway, this is the content.

The process is an attempt to demolish individual and national identity. The goal of the process is the achievement of financial interests.

These are crimes against the average citizen, against citizen’s safety and survival. The average citizen’s interest and safety are behind governments.

Our Team will work to expose these crimes and bring the responsible to justice. It starts now.

We citizens must stop this before it gets too far.

The Investigation Team.