Question: why someone would patent the manipulation of viruses if not for commercial purposes.
Question: how far this someone would go to gain financial benefits out of the patented research findings.
Question: gain of function research began as early as 2000. How that relates to the so called “novel” coronavirus pandemic.
Recently, the Investigative Corona Committee in Germany released an almost two-hour long video with information regarding the history of coronavirus in the United States. The committee has released over 50 live streamed informational sessions and continues to do so often. The video in question included dialogue from Dr. David Martin, who among other things, has been deeply involved in the investigation of coronavirus patents for over two decades.
Dr. Martin founded M-CAM, an international intangible asset underwriter and analyst firm spanning work in innovation finance, trade, and intangible asset finance. He serves as the CEO and Chairman.
M-CAM is considered the gold standard of patent risk analysis tools, determining on an international scale what threats are presented when patents are issued and what unique commercial opportunities may be present. They track patents, patent applications, federal grants, procurement records, and e-government records.
It is important to note that: M·CAM – has been monitoring possible violations of the 1925 Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Methods of Warfare (the Geneva Protocol) 1972 Convention on the Prohibition of Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons and Their Destruction (the BTWC).
Because of his line of work, Dr. Martin has reviewed over 4,000 patents issued around the coronavirus. He has also reviewed the financing of manipulation of coronavirus. At M-CAM, they took the reported novel coronavirus gene sequence (indicated as novel by the ICTV of the World Health Organization) and compared them to those on record that were already patented.
According to Dr. Martin, they found “over 120 patented pieces of evidence that the declaration of a novel coronavirus was actually entirely a fallacy” in their research. In addition, they found records of gene sequences attributed to novelty dating back over two decades, all the way back to 1999.
Pfizer sought out the first vaccine ever patented for coronavirus on Jan 28, 2000. Pfizer was then issued U.S. patent 6372224, which was a vaccine used for the canine form of coronavirus. This vaccine specifically included the S spike protein, which has been controversial in the media due to claims that the invention of this vaccine was rushed, and it is dangerous. In reality, this form of experimental approach to vaccine has been in existence for over 20 years.
Dr. Martin noted that one of the most concerning findings in his research pertained to Anthony Fauci, the current director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Fauci is most notably known for advising presidents on the HIV/AIDS crisis and other global health issues. Dr. Martin argues that Fauci and the NIAID identified coronavirus as malleable and a potential candidate for an HIV vaccine.
In addition, Dr. Martin provides evidence to prove that in 1999, Fauci funded research at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where an “infectious replication-defective coronavirus targeted for the human lung epithelium” was inorganically built. The creation of a genetically engineered virus such as this one allowed for genetic modifications through computer software that can turn code into pathogens through gene sequencing.
Dr. Martin and the team at M-CAM were monitoring treaty violations of biological and chemical warfare in the early 2000s. During this time, scientists began to realize that coronavirus could be manipulated to become a biological weapon.
The SARS-CoV (SARS) outbreak in the early 2000s was caused by a coronavirus. The outbreak began in China between 2002-2003 and resulted in the U.S. CDC filing for a patent in 2003. This patent (U.S. patent 7220852) included the gene sequence of what became known as the SARS coronavirus, however, there were issues with this patent.
Dr. Martin knows what he is talking about. Here is a patent from 2002 on: “Methods for producing recombinant coronavirus”
They were patenting manipulation of coronaviruses already in 2002. You can find it yourself online through the above link. Do a search on Ralph S. Baric for his connections with Anthony Fauci and the related funding.
“A still further aspect of the present invention is a method of introducing a heterologous RNA into a subject, comprising administering infectious nidovirus particles as described herein to the subject in an amount effective to introduce the heterologous RNA into the subject.”
Which is the mechanism that is used to create the “vaccines” and for several other medical purposes. Exactly the same mechanism can be used to produce a bio-weapon.
Question: why the United States Department of Defense was funding the experiments in Wuhan through EcoHealth Alliance as we describe in This Article. Is the atomic bomb stopping globalists from imposing their will on nations so that they need “new ways” of exerting power.
So far only “orange revolutions” and local wars are possible without the risk of being hit by an atomic bomb.
Question: if that is the case then who is the “enemy.” Is the enemy their own citizens regardless of what the country.
Question: is in the globalists’ view of the world perfectly “okay” to cooperate on this kind of stuff by funding it with the same nation to the seas of which they are also sending war ships.
In the case the actual official media rampant censorship shuts it down you can find this patent on our website: patent US7279327B2
Dr. Martin tells us that In the United States it is a violation to file a patent on a “product of nature”, so the application was rejected multiple times before later being approved. This patent covered the gene sequence and the means of detection for coronavirus using RT-PCR. According to Dr. Martin, “This is problematic because if you both own the patent on the gene itself, and on its detection, you have a cunning advantage to be able to control 100% of the provenance of not only the virus itself and its detection. You have entire scientific and message control.”
The CDC then claimed that their reasoning for this patent was so that everyone would be able to research the coronavirus. However, the patent office tried rejecting this patent multiple times because there was already a 99.9% genetic match with the coronavirus that was being researched already in the public domain. Additionally, the CDC paid an extra fine to keep the information within the application private until approval.
Only three days after the CDC received the patent for the SARS coronavirus gene sequence, a domestic pharmaceutical company in Maryland called Sequoia Pharmaceuticals sent in a patent application for their coronavirus treatment. Sequoia pharmaceuticals later became a subset of Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and Crucell. He claims that this becomes a pattern seen later when Moderna was engineering the vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 (known also as Covid-19).
In 2008, research was being conducted on SARS-CoV where attributes of the virus were recorded, and these attributes were later allegedly claimed to be novel to SARS-CoV-2. Patents were approved for RNA and sub-components of gene strands for the companies Ablynx and Sanofi. There was a total of 73 patents issued between 2008 and 2019 that all had the common ground of elements that were allegedly novel to SARS-CoV-2.
“By 2016, a paper by Ralph Baric was funded during the gain-of-function moratorium, saying SARS coronavirus was poised for human emergence,” Dr. Martin said. “At that time, it was not only poised for human emergence, but was patented for commercial exploitation 73 times.” Dr. Martin then goes on to explain how this was an intentional bio-weaponization of spike proteins that will be injected and cause humans to become dependent on pan-coronavirus vaccines. Dr. Martin asserted his beliefs that the goal of all this is to inject humans with potentially harmful S1 spike proteins.
Dr. Martin also went on to explain that there are no delta, gamma, beta, or alpha variants of SARS-CoV-2. By using fear of potentially dangerous new strains of the virus, more individuals would be inclined to accept a vaccine that they might otherwise decline. Depending on the fragment of the gene sequence being examined, it can be made to seem like there are different variants of the virus when it’s the same gene sequence just cut up at different points.
In the interview, Dr. Martin pointed out that there is a huge obstacle standing in the way of many fact checkers who may want to seek this information out. Many of the gene sequences are not digitally represented well, so someone fact checking this information would likely need to seek out paper records in order to make comparisons. When Dr. Martin and his colleagues did that exactly, they found that none of the gene sequences were novel in the first place.
More info on the Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier published by Dr. Martin here:
Dr. Martin presented many pieces of evidence throughout the two-hour informational session. Here Dr. Martin is interviewed by international lawyer Reiner Fuellmich. (video may start with little delay)
For the German version go to the Investigative Corona Committee of Germany’s website here:
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.