A genetically modified organism (GMO) is any organism altered by genetic engineering techniques.
The European Union (EU) has a strict legislation on genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
The goal to prevent any adverse effects on the environment. It should prevent harm to the health and safety of humans and animals. Harm caused by genetically modified organisms.
On 15 July 2020 the EU changed the regulation of the legislation. It did that to allow clinical trials with genetically modified organisms.
You can find the decision here: Regulation (EU) 2020/1043
In article 4 you read: “1.This Regulation shall apply as long as WHO has declared COVID-19 to be a pandemic or as long as an implementing act by which the Commission recognizes a situation of public health emergency due to COVID-19 in accordance with Article 12 of Decision No 1082/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council(7) applies.”
Again, you can read in the paper that the regulation should make simpler local bureaucracy. The idea is to “help” local laws take responsibility on what will happen with vaccines.
At the end:
“The regulation is binding and directly applicable in all Member States.”
The directive applies for as long as W.H.O considers the “pandemic” a pandemic or EU decides so. In practice for as long as W.H.O decides so.
The regulation does not affect GMO medicines, it only affects “vaccines.”
So why such a strict legislation against modifying organisms by genetic engineering?
Because there are risks for humans connected with doing that!
After this regulation they still forbid doing that to plants or food.
They allow doing it to average citizens.
The risks connected with genetic engineering organisms are not predictable!
So far genetic modification has been based on a theory that one gene will express (or “code for”) one protein.
An organism’s genetic information should account a unique pattern of inherited traits.
Should be one to one predictability.
That is not true as research showed in 2013.
It is not predictable.
In 2013 scientists have discovered a second code hiding within DNA.
They came to the conclusion that: “The fact that the genetic code can simultaneously write two kinds of information means that many DNA changes that appear to alter protein sequences may actually cause disease by disrupting gene control programs or even both mechanisms simultaneously.”
You can find it explained here: scientists discover double meaning in genetic code.
Link to the scientific article here: the hidden codes that shape protein evolution.
It means that modifying organisms is not predictable and can have dangerous consequences.
CDC reassures people on their web site about these “vaccines” by stating that:
mRNA never enters the nucleus of the cell, which is where our DNA (genetic material) is kept.
The cell breaks down and gets rid of the mRNA soon after it is finished using the instructions.
Under natural circumstances the body makes (“transcribes”) mRNA from the DNA in a cell’s nucleus.
The mRNA then travels out of the nucleus into the cytoplasm (the space out of the cell nucleus and inside the membrane of the cell)
There it provides instructions about which proteins to make.
This is the DNA > RNA pathway.
What they are saying at CDC is that the “vaccine” does it’s job inside the cell membrane.
It should do it without affecting the nucleus, where you have the DNA.
The natural process is that the DNA tells mRNA what to do to create proteins.
These so called “vaccines” double cross the natural process and create a protein of their own.
“Problem” is that the natural process goes also the other way.
They either forgot a process called reverse transcription or they think they can fool it.
There is also the inverse route: the RNA > DNA pathway.
Enzymes called reverse transcriptases can also convert RNA into DNA.
Will Pfizer/Moderna/Astra Zeneca mRNA be reverse transcripted into the natural DNA?
Will natural DNA smile at their mRNA and decide to stop giving it’s own instructions?
Yes sure… as they say at CDC “the cell breaks down the instructions and gets rid of Pfizer RNA.”
It will be “so fast” that the natural DNA will not notice…
Some psychopath took the role of God here.
And what the DNA natural coding will do in that situation?
Will that be “predictable”?
Why EU would have had a legislation against genetically modified organisms?
Why that legislation is still in place for drugs done with genetic engineering?
Are these “vaccines” in practices drugs?
Is the word “vaccine” meant to fool citizens? This kind of approach has never been used on humans.
Why the legislation is still in place for other GMOs?
Time will show and many will sit in Court Rooms if the shit will hit the fan when vaccinated people will get in contact with some virus or fragments of it.
If citizens will die even more than now for blood clouts and autoimmune reactions.
Let’s hope that the natural DNA will not get too angry.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.